This document is brought to you from the archives of
The Santa Barbara BBS Nostalgia Page

   
   94Jan18 2:27 pm from Zeylan
Sully, just out of curiosity... how many times have you used the "someone
hacked my account" excuse?  Can you count the number of times on both hands?
   
   94Jan18 2:49 pm from boxhead
Hey everyone.  You know what, Sully is been trying to biff my system all day.
What a lop.  I decided to take lunch, and here's what  came up:
  guess who: Boxhead is a jerk!
             BOXHEAD = BABY DRIVER = MIKE STAND = STUD = BOARD BIFFER!!!!!
             HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.  I KNOW THE TRUTH!
  ...Sully...: Boxhead admited to me that he is baby driver!! HAHAHA
               that means he is a rappist and a child molester
               and this bbs is LAME!
  I am Boxhead: And I am also a ton of other fake accounts
                like baby driver, and board biffer!! and STUD
                and my bbs is a lamer peice of shit
  This BBS SUCKS: what is the point of this shitty place. nobody even calls!
                  boxhead likes to talk to himself as baby driver.
                  HAHAHAHAHAHAHA. this place is crappy

  Sully... you can biff my system all you want.  It only takes 30 seconds to
delete the crap you input.

   94Jan18 3:10 pm from Sully
I didnt biff your system! Someone has been logging on as me and using my name
to post slanderous stuff all over as me. My accounts have been HACKED all over
town and its NOT MY FAULT. Boxhead is probably behind it, or Zeylan. I already
know who baby driver is.  Sysops can feel free to delete the hackers and
biffers who are using my name.

   94Jan18 4:29 pm from boxhead
Well, Sully, if it is not you... then, you suck anyway.
   
   94Jan18 5:36 pm from Sully
Yes I can count them on one hand zeylan.  The only time that I remember is a
couple of months ago when someone hacked my account on goob.  This was the
same time another account called "sullysteve" came out and made fun of me.  It
is curious how I am made to be at fault when I am the victim.  I said clearly
and distinctly on this bbs that someone hacked my account AND CHANGED THE
PASSWORD, yet nobody believed me.  Everyone knows who I am, someone could of
easily deleted the accounts on goob SINCE I SAID THAT THEY WERE HACKED AND THE
PASSWORD WAS CHANGED!!   After things died down a bit I asked Luminary if he
could delete the accounts so I could reuse them.  ASK him, he wiverify that he
did in fact delete the sully account which SOMEONE STOLE FROM ME.   And if any
sysops see a user  pretending to be me on a bbs that I did not list please
delete said user.

   94Jan19 9:23 am from boxhead
Sully, you are such a liar. You're pathetic.
   
   94Jan19 11:51 am from Boxhead
The Graf system has been experiencing problems because of a certain user
biffing my system.

   94Jan19 12:14 pm from Sully 
ANd let me guess boxhead, the user that biffed your bbs logged in as "sully"
or "steve s", correct?

   94Jan19 12:14 pm from Sully 
That would explain the nasty letters I have gotten from you that are tottally
senseless.

   94Jan19 12:38 pm from Boxhead 
Sully, I have copies of all the E-Mail threads you left me.  I will be
postingthese threads in a couple of minutes.

   94Jan19 1:09 pm from Boxhead 
There is an earthquake happening right now.  Whoa.

    However, I will not take the system down because Sully is biffing.  All I
can say is, I have my credibility.

   94Jan19 1:14 pm from Boxhead 
Whoa, okay, here are the threads that Sully left me:

     94Jan18 3:08 pm from Sully to boxhead
  HAHAHAHA. You think your so cool. But I know the truth!

     94Jan18 3:08 pm from Sully to boxhead
  I will keep it up! as long as you keep posting as baby
  driver!

     94Jan19 8:52 am from Sully to boxhead
  HAHAHAHA, you dont scare me.  What are you going to do
  about it.  You cant prove I did anything! Someone hacked
  my account, I can always say that. Ive used that excuse
  before and gotten away with it and theres nothing you can
  do!!! I can continue to deny it. What are you going to do,
  trace my line. HAHAHAHAHAHA

     94Jan19 9:03 am from Sully to boxhead
  Your a lier. The police dont come out and install tracing
  stuff based on ONE complaint call! ! they have better
  things to do with there time than to trace bbs hackers
  like YOU. Besides I dont stay on the line long enough to
  be traced and if you dont want to receive harassing calls
  then take down your crummy bbs. And stop calling as Baby
  Driver and I wont have to do this.

     94Jan19 9:04 am from boxhead to Sully
  I am not Baby Driver.  End of discussion.

     94Jan19 9:09 am from Sully to boxhead
  Yes you are. End of discussion.

  I have around the systems since 1984.  I have been programming
professionally since 1986.  I have no reason to slander a user unless I am
being attacked.  I will not let Sully make a mockery of me.  For the past two
days, he has been constantly harassing my system.  This forced me to take it
down, because I can't be distracted while I am working.
  At this point, I think it's an issue of credibility.  For one thing, my next
project is going to be a user log.  I am not just going to throw away 23000
lines of code.

   94Jan19 12:16 pm from boxhead
Well, nice message Sully.  By the way, everyone, I have been receiving a
barrage of E-Mail from Sully... Here's what he left:

   94Jan19 8:52 am from Sully to boxhead HAHAHAHA, you dont scare me.  What
are you going to do about it.  You cant prove I did anything! Someone hacked
my account, I can always say that. Ive used that excuse before and gotten away
with it and theres nothing you can do!!! I can continue to deny it. What are
you going to do, trace my line. HAHAHAHAHAHA

... That message was left this morning.  Here's some more:

   94Jan19 9:03 am from Sully to boxhead Your a lier. The police dont come out
and install tracing stuff based on ONE complaint call! ! they have better
things to do with there time than to trace bbs hackers like YOU. Besides I
dont stay on the line long enough to be traced and if you dont want to receive
harassing calls then take down your crummy bbs. And stop calling as Baby
Driver and I wont have to do this.

... What do you mean by "I won't have to do this."

     At this point in time, I believe Sully has lost his credibility with alot
of users here.  Myself and other users have been the subjects for his abuse,
and I will not stand for it.

    He called my board at 8am this morning to start leaving messages saying
that my system sucked.  Well, Sully never even fully looked at this system.
According to several of my sources, his name is Steve Sullivan, in his 20's.
Any information about this person would be greatly appreciated.

    By the way, Steve, haven't you got anything better to do than call my
system at 8 in the morning?  Sounds like you need to get a life.

   94Jan19 2:29 pm from Sully
I did NOT post those messages to boxhead!! Boxhead you are such a lier its not
even funny. I suppose you think its clever to post fake emails to try and
discredit me. Its not my fault if SOMEONE ELSE logged into your lame bbs and
pretended to be me! I told you already that someone has been doing that
lately! My accounts all over town have been HACKED and my passwords CHANGED.

   94Jan19 2:49 pm from boxhead
Sure Sully.  Again, who is more credible in this case?

   94Jan19 3:09 pm from boxhead
Oh by the way, Sully, I'd like to meet you.  In person.  When would be a good
time for you?
   
   94Jan19 6:33 pm from Sully 
Oh, So boxhead, some user creates an account named "sully", flames and biffs
you, and you assume that it is me?  If someone created an account named "bob
blaylock" and did the same would you think the same thing?  We all know how
easy it is to call a bbs and and make an account, how hard would it be for
someone to make an account with my name??!!  I mean DUH!! This is so
incredibly F###ing stupid! And frankly, BOXHEAD, YOU ARE BEING STUPID!  What
is your message to everyone??!  It is "if you dont like me, find a bbs that I
do not call, create an account with my name and then flame everyone in sight!
This is just so incredibly stupid...

   94Jan19 8:03 pm from Hobgoblin
Sully, I don't believe you.

   94Jan20 10:25 am from Sully
Boxhead, you are so STUPID if you think its really ME thats biffing your
system! Get a clue! Anybody could log in and say they were sully or steve s.
Someone out there is trying to slandir me and give me a bad name and make me
look stupid. And your stupid if you beleive it.

   94Jan20 10:49 am from boxhead
Sully, you need to take English 100 over.

   94Jan20 10:54 am from boxhead
Oh by the way, was it you that sent me that E-Mail that I posted?  Yep.  You
said in the mail that you would stop doing it if I stopped posting as BD.
Anyways, I thought you were stupid before I even knew you.

   94Jan20 12:56 pm from Sully
I never sent you any email!!!! I already told you that!!!! Why are you trying
to slandir my good name? What did I ever do to you that would cause you to
FAKE emails and post them! I have told you a hundred TIMES that its NOT ME
BIFFING YOUR STUPID BBS!!!!!

   94Jan20 2:15 pm from Joseph Decker
That's not what you told me in Email, Sully.

   94Jan20 2:46 pm from Sully
I didnt tell him anything!!!! Joseph Decker is obviously boxhead.

   94Jan20 3:11 pm from boxhead
Hey everyone!  Sully left me some more love notes:
     94Jan20 12:58 pm from Sully to boxhead
  You think your so smart. Everyone beleives me when I say
  my accounts have been hacked, so why bother argueing. And
  everyone KNOWS that you have FAKE ACCOUNTS and that you
  are baby and that your bbs is LAME. Im not the stupid one,
  YOU are!

  Steve Sullivan, If I ever meet you, I am going to kick to
  the living shit out of you.  Guaranteed.

   94Jan20 3:13 pm from boxhead
By the way Sully, I didn't know you had a good name.  I thought it sucked.

   94Jan20 3:25 pm Molak must die..... from Arconian @ BowHead _ Santa Barbara
Sully, you're trying too hard, and you're losing what little credibility yoou
still own.

   94Jan21 9:35 am from Sully
Why is every body trying to descredit me!!!!


Sorry, but due to a recent rash of vandalism, this BBS is not currently accepting new accounts. If you personally know Wishbone or Bob Blaylock,then contact either of them directly, and perhaps they will give you an account. Otherwise, try again in a week or so. You may thank Steve Sullivan for this latest round of vandalism, and for forcing us to close new-user access to this system for the time being, preventing you from being able to get an account here. You may contact Steve at (805)967-0854, or visit him at 5450 Toltec Drive, in Santa Barbara. I'm sure he'd love to hear what you think about his efforts to interfere with your ability to use and enjoy this BBS. NO CARRIER
94Oct11 2:30 pm from revenge hi bob!!! 94Oct11 2:30 pm from revenge hi bob!!! 94Oct11 2:30 pm from revenge hi bob!!! 94Oct11 2:30 pm from revenge hi bob!!! 94Oct11 4:46 pm from IDK Well, that is... very annoying. 94Oct11 4:48 pm to Sysop in Mail> from Zeylan Jesus almighty! Not again! 94Oct11 5:39 pm Mental Liquid from Luminary Coremaster Woo-hoo, what a revenge. Good thing this person didn't encounter Bob in person. He might have drooled on himself as a witty revenge tactic. 94Oct11 5:41 pm Mental Liquid from Luminary Coremaster Better back it up or erase the rooms before it carries over to Swagland. 94Oct11 5:57 pm from Sicko Damn assh*les.. 94Oct11 7:35 pm from Opie Sigh. 94Oct11 7:59 pm from Bob Blaylock I'm sure Steve Sullivan, at 5450 Toltec Drive, or 967-0854, would love to hear from all of you, what you think of his handiwork. 94Oct11 8:33 pm from SMARTBOMB what happened to all the messages in the Mac room and most of the other rooms too? 94Oct11 8:42 pm Ha Ha Ha! from SMARTBOMB Who got rid of the Jokes room? Someone made a new one but why did they get rid of it in the first place? 94Oct11 9:11 pm to Sysop in Mail> from Zeylan You're not a very smart bomb, are you? 94Oct12 3:34 am from Human Are we really sure it was Sully who did that? I've been dealing wih him i a bussiness matter for the last 2 months, and I've spoken to im many times. I just can't se it. The last biff (from Sullyx) he swears he had nothing to do with, I would not be so quick to condem, isn't that how these bad feelings began? The original Santa Barbara Biffer is still at large. He is obviously a clever sociopath and would have great glee at being able to masquerade as somebody else with a bad rap. My intuition is pretty good and it's speaking to me right now. Bob, what is the evidence against Steve? It would be nice if we had caller id available in instances like this. I have my suspicions but I will hold my tongue. Let's see what kind of fire I draw. 94Oct12 1:25 pm from Bob Blaylock OK, here's what i have: A person using the name "Sully", and giving his "real name" as "Steve Sullivan", and giving a phone number which happens to match a Sullivan in the phone book, has been a user off-and-on for quite some time. He's always had a difficult time, it seems, understanding that there are certain rules of conduct that are expected of people who use this BBS. Several months ago, having been warned numerous times previously, Sully posted a message on this BBS containing obscene language, so, for the umpteenth time, I twitted his account. The manner in which I twitted him had the effect of making him "invisible"; he could post messages, but nobody else would see them. The intent, basically, is to silence an unruly user without it being obvious to the offender that he's been silenced. After several months, Sully discovered that his messages were invisible; it was right after that that someone, presumably Sully, started creating accounts with names like "sully2", "sully3", etc. Each time I twitted an account, he'd create a new one. Some time around the time he was up to "sully4" or "sully5", he biffed the BBS. After that, I closed new-user access to this BBS for about a month or so, until I stopped seeing regular attempts to log in under various forms of "Sully" or "Steve Sullivan". I just opened new user access less than a week ago. Yesterday, there was a new account created, using the name "steve s", followed immediately by yet another account, under the name "revenge", which was used to biff this BBS again. OK, I admit there's nothing in here that absolutely proves that Steve Sullivan is the culprit, but the circumstantial evidence, especially in the earlier biffing, is very strong. Not just on this BBS, but on others as well, Steve Sullivan has demonstrated, for as long as he's been in BBSing, a disregard for any rules of polite or acceptible conduct. He refuses to obey the rules that apply to any BBS he uses, he is rude and abusive to other users, and then he complains because nobody likes him. To be sure, there are plenty of people who don't like Sully, and would love to see him in real trouble. It's certainly possible that there is an active effort on the part of some other person to commit acts of vandalism and frame Sully for it. However, given the behavior that Sully has openly demonstrated in the past, along with his openly-displayed lack of sense or intelligence, I find it much more believable that Sully himself is doing these things as part of his latest tantrum over my unwillingness to allow his use of obscene language on this BBS. If this is the work of someone else, impersonating Sully, then it would have to be either someone close to Sully, or someone who has access to information on this BBS which is not generally available to the public. 94Oct12 4:35 pm from Sicko That doesn't seem like strong evidence to me, Bob. But it doesn't go to say that who ever did it was a real idiot. Must have free time beyond his capacity to understand what to do with it. Unfortunately, it will show when he's older, resulting in his lack of skills generated from not using his times wisely (like game playing really produces quality skills).. oh well. 94Oct12 5:05 pm from colin campbell Didn't Swagman protect his board against this kind of stuff by adding something that logs you off if you enter three or more messages into a room in a row? Could you do that to the Whale? 94Oct12 5:12 pm from Bob Blaylock Earlier versions of Asgard or Citadel had an anti-biff feature like that, but this version apparently does not. 94Oct12 6:01 pm to Sysop in Mail> from Zeylan Bob, do you still have an account on Hotel? That might be something worthwhile to suggest to the author of Asgard, Gary Whateverhisnameis. Also, private floors might be a solution as well. I seem to recall that the original Digital Dungeon used to get hit, but the biffer was kept out of the many rooms on private floors. 94Oct12 7:06 pm from john travolta I heard a rumor from someone who knows you that you are getting married...is this true. does this mean you are no longer going to pay attention to you computerr computer ? I certainly hope not because a women should not come between a man and his computer. 94Oct12 7:30 pm Flatulent Emission from Swagman What an unfortunate occurrance. It came across the net, but Math Blaster cleaned it up before I got home from work. The old Digital Dungeon got biffed to oblivion regularly, then the private room thing worked for a little while until the ruse was discovered and thence the whole place was once again biffed to smithereens. Swagland has been biffed, but for some time has been mercifully biff free. The message limit per room tends to discourage the process but I suspect it would still be biffable to a patient enterprizing hacker with more time on their time than sense. I keep a closed system, in that people have to leave email to the sysop to get an account, which is generally done within 24 hours with no validation required. Every time I've opened access, the place has been biffed so I make new users ask for accounts. I'd much rather have a completely open system, but none the less, I create virtually every account requested (except those with names that irritate me I ignore, actually Math Blaster is supposed to make the new accounts and lately I've caught him slacking so there may have been some accounts unmade due to negligence). 94Oct12 9:54 pm to Sysop in Mail> from Zeylan Gooblesnortembopy was biffed into massive oblivion this week. It seems to happen in spurts; when it happens, it happens to all the boards all at once, then it stops for a few months. 94Oct13 12:36 am from Bob Blaylock "John Travolta": Yes, it's true. I'm engaged, and plan to marry. An exact date hasn't been set yet, but we're shooting for early April of next year. 94Oct13 8:26 am Mental Liquid from Luminary Coremaster There is no proof that Sully did it; and what's more, is that the LAST time the board was biffed under Sully's name, Bob posted his address, phone number, et cetera. And this time, Bob posted the information again. So the biffer has access to this so-called "private" information, and next time he wants to biff the board and frame Sully for it, he'll just create an account and include all of the personal info that Bob has posted publically at least twice. Gooble has been getting biffed almost every day now. It's busy this morning, and I wouldn't be surprised if the biffer were on right now. Oh, also. Read Bob's last paragraph about "the biffer must be someone close to Sully, or someone who has access to information on this BBS which is generally not available to the public." Bob, you've POSTED that information two or three times now! It's no big secret who Sully is and what his address and phone number is. On GoobleSnortEmBopy, the biffer once biffed the user-log and made an account named after the sysop. Then he made accounts of all of the regular users on line. He pretended that he WAS the sysop, and that he wanted everybody to leave the BBS. His "proof" was that he "took away" the peoples' other accounts. So things are not always as they seem. 94Oct13 8:49 am to Sysop in Mail> from Zeylan I'm still not convinced that the sysop of Gooble wasn't responsible for that first supposed "sysop impersonator biff" since he knew about it for weeks and did nothing to stop it. But, then again, he's a do-nothing sysop who seems to enjoy it when his system is trashed beyond repair. Who knows. 94Oct13 9:54 am from Bob Blaylock Until after the earlier biff, none of the information had been made public. What I said about the access the biffer must have had to this information is certainly true in the case of this earlier biff. 94Oct13 12:05 pm Flatulent Emission from Swagman Just because you might not be paranoid doesn't mean the aliens won't vanquish you totally, Bob. The Venusians biffed the Bowhead. 94Oct13 12:22 pm to Sysop in Mail> from Zeylan Mars needs women. 94Oct13 9:12 pm from INFINITE RETRY mars needs a good women like john travolta says. 94Oct13 10:30 pm to Sysop in Mail> from Zeylan You missed the reference completely. Nevermind. 94Oct13 11:07 pm from JSK Regarding the sysop that enjoys watching his system get trashed. Maybe these are the same people who leave their food in the company 'fridge until thick layers of mold are growing on it. Just to see the interesting colors. 94Oct14 7:37 am from Bahamut Always good to see someone botch a reference up entirely by bringing up John Travolta. 94Oct14 5:02 pm from colin campbell Mars needs Plan 9. Then again, one fringe group insists Zepp biffed his own board. 94Oct14 6:51 pm to Sysop in Mail> from Zeylan That's not surprising. Then again, DDX used to biff his own board. 94Oct14 6:59 pm from Bahamut Sysop biff! Format the hard drive and laugh at the users! 94Oct15 11:02 am Mental Liquid from Luminary Coremaster Bob, that was the second time you've posted Sully's personal information. I know this for a fact. I remember this. You have posted Sully's personal info twice in the context of "Don't like the biffing? Give Sully a call." 94Oct15 12:02 pm from The Wombat Yeah. I admit the evedence some what requires his name, but still, that's not good.
94Oct11 4:45 pm from IDK Ok, that pisses me off. He even biffed in the Doom room. 94Oct11 8:15 pm from Bob Blaylock Give him a call and let him know how you feel. His number is 967-0854, and his address is 5450 Toltec Drive. 94Oct11 9:13 pm to Sysop in Mail> from Zeylan Have _you_ given him a call yet, Bob? 94Oct11 10:31 pm Mental Liquid from Luminary Coremaster Do you have any real proof that it's him? I mean, if it says it's him in the user info, it could have been the biffer copying his address from the last time that you posted it. 94Oct12 12:47 am from Bob Blaylock No solid proof, alas, but some very heavy circumstantial evidence. 94Oct12 2:09 am from JSK Like he phoned afterwards and asked if the BBS had been biffed lately? Just think of the fun you could have calling up the cops everyday, identifying yourself, then asking if any bombs had gone off today. "No, no, just asking." 94Oct12 4:37 pm from Sicko Actually, there's caller ID services available. That's only a few dollars a month, and after you catch the culprit, you can cancel. I'm sure that the cost of the service justifies the down time in the BBS it takes for you to fix it, etc. etc. 94Oct12 5:13 pm from Bob Blaylock Caller ID is not available in California. Our PUC apparently has determined that prank callers, BBS vandals, and such have a right to privacy which supersedes the right of their victims to have an easy way to track them down. 94Oct12 6:02 pm to Sysop in Mail> from Zeylan Sounds like it's time for another letter to your congressman, Bob. 94Oct12 11:38 pm from JSK There's always phone verification of new users. 94Oct13 12:45 am from Bob Blaylock Phone verification is a nuisance. Caller ID, if offered, would be the most perfect solution to BBS vandalism. With a Caller-ID-compatible modem, and proper support for it in the software, a BBS could keep a log of all the ID's from which callers logged in. If a BBS is vandalized, it'd be simple enough to match the ID with the vandal; the ID could then be turned over to the proper authorities as solid evidence with which to prosecute the vandal, and the BBS could be set to refuse any further calls bearing that ID. Opponents of Caller-ID have one good point. I can see how a person legitimately might not want his phone number displayed to the person he calls. But then it seems to me there's a very obvious way around that, which would provide nearly all the benefits of Caller-ID, while protecting the caller's privacy. Instead of the caller's name and/or phone number, the Caller-ID system should send a separate, unique ID code; this code would not necessarily tell the recipient of the call who the caller was, or how to call him back, but the recipient could match that code with previous calls from the same code, and, in the case of obscene, harrassing, or otherwise illegal phone usage, this code could be turned over to law enforcement agents, who would be given access to the phone company's records which would match that coe to the specific phone from which the troublesome call was placed. 94Oct13 12:50 am from JSK There's always the pay phones, if they continue to exist. They would allow privacy when calling the IRS, and few BBS biffers would drag their computers out to the pay phones. They're probably in the age group that can't afford laptops anyway. 94Oct13 8:32 am Mental Liquid from Luminary Coremaster That's a very good idea. I wish Caller-ID was available here. If everybody had a code it would protect privacy and allow caller-ID at the same time. And if someone breaks the law, they forfeit their rights, so it would be perfectly acceptable to turn over their code and have them arrested. 94Oct13 8:54 am to Sysop in Mail> from Zeylan You all seem to forget something. For every invention such as Caller ID, there have been inventions to counteract such gadgets. Radar detectors are a prime example of defense against this kind of technology. So there are phones already on the market which squelch, hide, or otherwise change the Caller ID signal being sent. So instead of a phone number being sent as someon's ID, you'd get -------- or maybe XXXXXXXXX. What good would that do you? 94Oct13 9:56 am from Bob Blaylock The Caller ID wouldn't be generated by the caller's phone; it would be generated by the phone company. 94Oct13 10:46 am from Yossarian Just curious, with no malicious intent, would call-forwarding (in way of a cut-out) get around Caller ID? It would seem so. 94Oct13 10:51 am to Sysop in Mail> from Zeylan And what about the callback service that GTE provides? I knwo that's available here. Or at least I think it is. When the offending idiot calls, you can use the feature to call his number right back, or more importantly to lock it out completely. 94Oct13 12:47 pm from Bob Blaylock Not useful. You're thinking of Call Return, right? All this does is allow you, by typing a certain sequence on your keypad, to place a call back to whoever last called you. It does not provide any information to you regarding where that call came from. 94Oct13 1:17 pm to Sysop in Mail> from Zeylan Bzzt, incorrect for 500 dollars. Part of the Call Return is the feature to LOCK OUT the last number that called you. That number cannot call you until you unlock it. Sounds like a solution to me. 94Oct13 6:15 pm from Sicko But then you can call him up and post 10,000 messages to his ear. I thought caller ID was available here. I keep getting bombarded with commericals about it.. or it could be call return.. either way, with call return, that's almost as good. You can call them up, hear their voice, and confront them uno y uno. 94Oct13 6:28 pm to Sysop in Mail> from Zeylan Or lock them out completely. 94Oct13 11:17 pm from JSK Sicko, I confirm Zeylan's affirmation that caller ID is not available in California. What I read (in possibly a mailing from GTE) was that some Ca. judge decided caller ID didn't jibe with our constitution. 94Oct14 7:40 am from Bahamut Call BLOCK IS available, though. I'm not sure why this could nto be used to block a repeat biffer. SUre, he could use someone else's computer or haul a laptop to a payphone or change his number, but all these are serious inconveniences. 94Oct14 8:48 am to Sysop in Mail> from Zeylan And once the biffer uses up all his dial-in resources, you'll have locked him out completely. Problem solved. 94Oct14 11:48 am from Bob Blaylock Zeylan, I have Call Return on my personal line at home. There is no blocking feature included with it. I believe GTE does offer a separate call-blocking option, but it's a separate option from Call Return. Call Blocking has to be invoked right after the offending call. It would be useful here only if Wishbone was paying attention, noticed a call from an unwanted caller while it was taking place, or at least had noticed such a call to have taken place before another call came in, and invoked the block feature. Perhaps we'll have to see if this is a useful option. I don't think Wishbone himself is likely to be able to be home and watching at the times Sully seems inclined to strike, however his son or his wife might be. 94Oct14 4:27 pm from IDK Wait , Bob, earlyer on you said that the vandal would be sent to proper authorties. What crime is it for biffing a BBS. I know it's a crime, but what punishment. 94Oct14 4:45 pm to Sysop in Mail> from Zeylan It should be a crime to ask a question without a question mark. 94Oct14 5:40 pm from Sicko The crime for BBS biffing is probably on par with vandalism. The problem is, no one but the BBS community gives a wack about it (i.e, low priority on DA's list). Therefore, a biffer is most likely to get away with anything (if he's over 18 and independent). If he's still tied to parents, you can get some serious messing with psychological warfare by suing in the private sector. An act of suing is very inconvenient to most people (by taking time off work, etc. etc), and suing parents for property damage would be a nice way to deter attacks. 94Oct14 6:52 pm to Sysop in Mail> from Zeylan I think you'd lose, though. I doubt a judge would care less. 94Oct14 7:39 pm from Opie What about Judge Ito? 94Oct14 8:38 pm from IDK ? 94Oct14 8:40 pm from IDK Yeah, but what percentage of Americans go BBSing? 94Oct14 10:20 pm from JSK And don't forget, to use your computer with a payphone, you've got to use an acoustic (unless you can take the phone apart and use clip leads), and that probably means you're at 300bps. 94Oct14 10:59 pm from Bob Blaylock At the very least, vandalizing a BBS would fall under the same laws that cover other illegal phone calls, such as unwanted obscene, threatening, or harrassing phone calls. A biffer would be legally the same thing as a guy who calls women and then breathes heavily into the phone. I'm vaguely aware of the existence of federal "anti-hacking" laws, but I'm not sure what all they cover, or whether they would apply to vandalizing a BBS. 94Oct15 11:11 am Mental Liquid from Luminary Coremaster The laws concerning computer crimes are so vague and generally nonexistant. But, OH! I just thought of something! Did you know that you can call up the phone company, and have them send you a list of all the people who have called you? They don't like to do it, but you are able to get this list from them. I have a friend who got the list, to prove that someone had called him. Hey! This could be the solution! Wishbone, you should look into this! Call up the phone company and get them to send you a list of everybody who called you in the past month! It probably costs something, but it would be worth it to be able to find out who the biffer is once and for all, and post his number publically so that the entire telecommunity can harrass him and run him out of town on a rail. But again, this is an actual option. I guess people generally don't know about it. GET THE LIST! 94Oct15 12:08 pm from The Wombat Isn't it time your phone does more than just ring?" Get A clue Picard! Our phones are more advanced than our computers now! 94Oct15 2:39 pm to Sysop in Mail> from Zeylan How in the hell would a list of everyone who calls here help? Sully has called here many times. Luminary, YOU have called here many times. Maybe that proves you are the biffer. What a stupid concept. 94Oct15 7:59 pm from Bob Blaylock If this list is really available (I don't think it is, especially to anyone other than a law enforcement agent who is investigating a crime to which that list would be relevant) then it would be very solid proof. It'd be simple enough to match the times shown in this list with the times at which the BBS was vandalized.

- Back -

This page is © Copyright 1997 by Swagazine. All rights reserved.